Anthony Harvey/PictureGroup; Dominique Charriau/WireImage; INF

According to court papers recently filed by supermodel Linda Evangelista, her son, Augustin James, 4, was fathered by Hayek's husband, François-Henri Pinault. Hayek and Pinault wed in 2009, but dated since 2006, around the time Evangelista got pregnant. (Pinault has two other children ? a son and a daughter ? from his previous marriage, which ended in divorce in 2004.)

Now Evangelista has filed a petition seeking support from the French businessman, 49.

"In the filing, it says the child 'was born out of wedlock to [petitioner] Linda Evangelista, 46, and that [Pinault] acknowledged [her] allegation,' " a source familiar with the filing tells PEOPLE. "It says, 'It is decided that Pinault is the father of [Evangelista's son], Augustin James.' "

It has not been determined how much support Pinault will be obligated to pay for his child with Evangelista.

"All that's left is for a magistrate to go over the father's filings and make a determination of support, which will last until the child is 21," the source says. "[Pinault] is asking to be able to testify by phone."

Meanwhile, another source tells PEOPLE: "This is no Schwarzenegger case. No one was married. There was no infidelity."

The Pinault family's luxury goods empire is reportedly worth $16-18 billion. Pinault's 2010 salary was $5.4 million, according to Bloomberg Businessweek.

In New York, where the court papers were filed, the law requires a father to pay 17 percent of what he earns in child support. This would mean Pinault should owe around $920,000 for that year.

Reps for Hayek, 44, and Evangelista have not returned request for comment.

• Additional Reporting by PETER MIKELBANK Vignette StoryServer 6.0 Sat Jul 02 18:01:35 2011

Meagan Good was seen on a shopping spree in L.A. with best friend Lil? B, who is also Brandy and Ray J?s godsister. The two girls hit up the Michael Kors store at the Beverly Center.  Meagan shopped till she dropped and purchased two bags at $ 1,500 each, and a dress.

Meagan and Lil? B also had time to pose for pictures with customers and the staff of Michael Kors.

To see the pics of Meagan and Lil? B on their shopping trip check out:

For more stories on Meagan Good, take a look at:

Meagan Good Gives Sneak Peek Of Underwear In Sheer Outfit [PHOTOS]

Meagan Good: ?I?m Single By Choice, God Is My Lover?

Meagan Good Stars In New Film ?Video Girl? [VIDEO]

Hello Beautiful » Celeb Pics

The TV presenter on Strictly, turning 40 and why she's superstitious about her pregnancy

Claudia Winkleman is 7 months pregnant

Claudia Winkleman is expecting her third child at 39 and is really enjoying her pregnancy.

'I absolutely love it,' she tells us. 'The beginning bit, particularly the throwing up, I found quite tricky but I'm so excited that I never get angry.

'The baby can do whatever it wants. I'm quite superstitious, though, so I won't have a feeding bottle or cot or anything in the house until it arrives.

'That does mean, however, that when you come home from the hospital you don't know where to put the baby.

'Luckily, babies are quite small, so they can fit in the drawers.

'I'd like two more but I've had to sign something for my husband [film producer Kris Thykier, 39], which says that this will be the last one.'

Claudia doesn't know if she's having a boy or a girl.

'My son Jake [eight] says he wants a brother and my daughter Matilda [five] wants a sister, so I had to sit them down and say: "Hey, here's the good news: either will rock."

'After all, it's not like we're getting a cactus!'

PICTURE GALLERY Pregnant celebrities>> 

SEE PICTURES Celebrity baby names A to Z>>

SEE PICTURES Strictly Come Dancing 2010
contestants revealed>>

SEE PICTURES Strictly Come Dancing 2010 - the
live shows>> 

Jul
3

One of my favorite quotes of all time is John Maynard Keynes' famous retort, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?" Unfortunately, too often people hold onto their opinions regardless of the changing landscape of facts.

News flashes across the screen and we immediately fill in as many blanks as possible using our knowledge, experience, imagination, biases, etc. This is human nature. It is how we function in the world given the vast amount of incomplete information that exists in every situation. We form opinions and then need to decide whether or not those opinions shift as new information arrives. Ideally, we are conscious of the biases that helped formed those opinions but, more often, they operate under the radar screen.

The Dominique Strauss Kahn (DSK) case seems like a textbook example. When the news first came out, many rushed to convict DSK while some instinctively defended him. Those who took a strong stand with minimal information were filling in those vast informational gaps with their imagination and biases. Those who immediately "convicted" DSK tended to make broad generalizations about the IMF, men in power or French culture. Those immediately "defended" DSK often made broad generalizations about the sex appeal of powerful men or negative stereotypes about the accuser's culture, socio-economic background, etc. From what minimal facts had been shared with the media, there seemed to be little question that there was a physical interaction between DSK and the accuser, yet the cases has boiled down to he-said/she-said concerning whether the interaction was consensual or forced. Not surprisingly, the defense soon adapted the strategy of attacking the witness.

Now that DSK has been freed from house arrest, many are rushing again to judge. Some blame the prosecution, some blame the accuser while others think this was all a set-up. In the end, we will most likely never really know whether a crime was committed or not, but that won't stop us from forming our opinions -- after all, we are human and that is how the mind works.

In general, as we form opinions in situations where the facts are limited, an important step is to ask ourselves not only what we believe, but, more introspectively, what specifically made us form that opinion. What information, personal knowledge, opinions and biases made us fill in the gaps the way we did? Then, as the facts change, are we willing to change our mind?

Please join Howard's Facebook Fan page

Follow Howard Steven Friedman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/howardsfriedman